| Title |
Cytochromeb gene of marine mammals: Phylogeny and evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, March 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01464349 |
| Authors |
David M. Irwin, Úlfur Árnason |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,013,543
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#65
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#535
of 22,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them