You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining how long fallow swidden systems impact upon livelihood and ecosystem services outcomes compared with alternative land-uses in the uplands of Southeast Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Development Effectiveness, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1080/19439342.2014.991799 |
| Authors |
Wolfram Dressler, David Wilson, Jessica Clendenning, Rob Cramb, Sango Mahanty, Rodel Lasco, Rodney Keenan, Phuc To, Dixon Gevana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,252,941
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Development Effectiveness
#83
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,578
of 352,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Development Effectiveness
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.