↓ Skip to main content

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11606-017-4249-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Verweij, Hiske van Ravesteijn, Madelon L. M. van Hooff, Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen, Anne E. M. Speckens

Abstract

Burnout is highly prevalent in residents. No randomized controlled trials have been conducted measuring the effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) on burnout in residents. To determine the effectiveness of MBSR in reducing burnout in residents. A randomized controlled trial comparing MBSR with a waitlist control group. Residents from all medical, surgical and primary care disciplines were eligible to participate. Participants were self-referred. The MBSR consisted of eight weekly 2.5-h sessions and one 6-h silent day. The primary outcome was the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Dutch version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey. Secondary outcomes included the depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment subscales of burnout, worry, work-home interference, mindfulness skills, self-compassion, positive mental health, empathy and medical errors. Assessment took place at baseline and post-intervention approximately 3 months later. Of the 148 residents participating, 138 (93%) completed the post-intervention assessment. No significant difference in emotional exhaustion was found between the two groups. However, the MBSR group reported significantly greater improvements than the control group in personal accomplishment (p = 0.028, d = 0.24), worry (p = 0.036, d = 0.23), mindfulness skills (p = 0.010, d = 0.33), self-compassion (p = 0.010, d = 0.35) and perspective-taking (empathy) (p = 0.025, d = 0.33). No effects were found for the other measures. Exploratory moderation analysis showed that the intervention outcome was moderated by baseline severity of emotional exhaustion; those with greater emotional exhaustion did seem to benefit. The results of our primary outcome analysis did not support the effectiveness of MBSR for reducing emotional exhaustion in residents. However, residents with high baseline levels of emotional exhaustion did appear to benefit from MBSR. Furthermore, they demonstrated modest improvements in personal accomplishment, worry, mindfulness skills, self-compassion and perspective-taking. More research is needed to confirm these results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 89 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 6%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 99 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,719,311
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,957
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,187
of 452,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#37
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.