↓ Skip to main content

Inductive k-independent graphs and c-colorable subgraphs in scheduling: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scheduling, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Inductive k-independent graphs and c-colorable subgraphs in scheduling: a review
Published in
Journal of Scheduling, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10951-018-0595-8
Authors

Matthias Bentert, René van Bevern, Rolf Niedermeier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 50%
Mathematics 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#16,293,793
of 24,002,307 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#72
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,641
of 442,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,002,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.