↓ Skip to main content

Myths about critical care echocardiography: the ten false beliefs that intensivists should understand

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Myths about critical care echocardiography: the ten false beliefs that intensivists should understand
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-014-3622-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Mayo, Armand Mekontso Dessap, Antoine Vieillard-Baron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 15%
Other 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 74%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,659,831
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,069
of 5,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,230
of 354,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#52
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.