↓ Skip to main content

Observational Assessment of Surgical Teamwork: A Feasibility Study

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Observational Assessment of Surgical Teamwork: A Feasibility Study
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00268-005-0488-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shabnam Undre, Andrew N. Healey, Ara Darzi, Charles A. Vincent

Abstract

Teamwork is fundamental to effective surgery, yet there are currently no measures of teamwork to guide training, evaluate team interventions or assess the impact of teamwork on outcomes. We report the first steps in the development of an observational assessment of teamwork and preliminary findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 112 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Engineering 7 6%
Computer Science 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,780,158
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#589
of 4,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,120
of 66,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.