↓ Skip to main content

Action spectroscopy of a protonated peptide in the ultraviolet range

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Action spectroscopy of a protonated peptide in the ultraviolet range
Published in
Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c4cp04762a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francis Canon, Aleksandar R. Milosavljević, Laurent Nahon, Alexandre Giuliani

Abstract

Action spectroscopy of protonated substance P, a model undecapeptide, has been probed from 5.2 eV to 20 eV. For photon energy above the ionization threshold measured at 10.3 ± 0.1 eV, the radical dication is observed along with side chain losses and abundant formation of all kinds of sequence ions. Below the photoionization threshold, the photoproducts involve side chain cleavages and backbone cleavages into a-, b-/y-, and c-sequence ions. Different electronic excited states appear to produce different fragment ions. Norrish type I and II reactions are proposed to account for some photoproducts. This study bridges the gap between laser activation and electron-induced dissociation of peptides. Moreover, our results report for the first time a comprehensive picture of the photochemical fragmentation of a gas phase peptide in a wide photon energy range.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 33%
Chemistry 10 28%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,997,104
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#7,065
of 17,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,345
of 361,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
#361
of 786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.