| Title |
Differences in acromial morphology of shoulders in patients with degenerative and traumatic supraspinatus tendon tears
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-014-3499-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maurice Balke, Dennis Liem, Oliver Greshake, Juergen Hoeher, Bertil Bouillon, Marc Banerjee |
| Abstract |
Distinct characteristics of acromial morphology seem to be one factor for the development of degenerative supraspinatus tendon tears. Thus, it is questionable whether patients with traumatic tendon tears also present these parameters. The hypothesis of the present study was that the acromial morphology of patients with degenerative supraspinatus tendon tears differs from patients with traumatic tears. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,389,490
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2,098
of 2,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,548
of 352,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.