Title |
Mathematical modeling improves EC50 estimations from classical dose–response curves
|
---|---|
Published in |
FEBS Journal, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1111/febs.13194 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elin Nyman, Isa Lindgren, William Lövfors, Karin Lundengård, Ida Cervin, Theresia Arbring Sjöström, Jordi Altimiras, Gunnar Cedersund |
Abstract |
The beta-adrenergic response is impaired in failing hearts. When studying beta-adrenergic function in vitro, the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50 ) is an important measure of ligand response. We previously measured the in vitro contraction force response of chicken heart tissue to increasing concentrations of adrenaline, but noted a decreasing response at high concentrations. The classical interpretation of such data would be to assume maximal response before the decrease and fit a sigmoid curve to the remaining data to determine EC50 . We have applied a mathematical modeling approach to instead interpret the full dose-response curve in a new way. The developed model predicts a non-steady-state caused by short resting time between increased concentrations of agonist, which affect the dose-response characterization. Therefore, an improved estimate of EC50 can be calculated using steady-state simulations of the model. The model-based estimation of EC50 is further refined with additional time-resolved data to decrease the uncertainty of the prediction. The resulting model-based EC50 (180-525 nM) is higher than the classical interpreted EC50 (46-191 nM). Mathematical modeling thus makes it possible to reinterpret already obtained datasets, and to make accurate estimates of EC50 even when steady-state measurements are not experimentally feasible. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 18% |
Engineering | 5 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |