↓ Skip to main content

Mathematical modeling improves EC50 estimations from classical dose–response curves

Overview of attention for article published in FEBS Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mathematical modeling improves EC50 estimations from classical dose–response curves
Published in
FEBS Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.1111/febs.13194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elin Nyman, Isa Lindgren, William Lövfors, Karin Lundengård, Ida Cervin, Theresia Arbring Sjöström, Jordi Altimiras, Gunnar Cedersund

Abstract

The beta-adrenergic response is impaired in failing hearts. When studying beta-adrenergic function in vitro, the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50 ) is an important measure of ligand response. We previously measured the in vitro contraction force response of chicken heart tissue to increasing concentrations of adrenaline, but noted a decreasing response at high concentrations. The classical interpretation of such data would be to assume maximal response before the decrease and fit a sigmoid curve to the remaining data to determine EC50 . We have applied a mathematical modeling approach to instead interpret the full dose-response curve in a new way. The developed model predicts a non-steady-state caused by short resting time between increased concentrations of agonist, which affect the dose-response characterization. Therefore, an improved estimate of EC50 can be calculated using steady-state simulations of the model. The model-based estimation of EC50 is further refined with additional time-resolved data to decrease the uncertainty of the prediction. The resulting model-based EC50 (180-525 nM) is higher than the classical interpreted EC50 (46-191 nM). Mathematical modeling thus makes it possible to reinterpret already obtained datasets, and to make accurate estimates of EC50 even when steady-state measurements are not experimentally feasible. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Engineering 5 13%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Mathematics 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from FEBS Journal
#10,143
of 12,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,139
of 360,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEBS Journal
#32
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.