↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Mortality on Fertility: Population Dynamics After a Natural Disaster

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
29 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
The Effects of Mortality on Fertility: Population Dynamics After a Natural Disaster
Published in
Demography, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13524-014-0362-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna Nobles, Elizabeth Frankenberg, Duncan Thomas

Abstract

Understanding how mortality and fertility are linked is essential to the study of population dynamics. We investigate the fertility response to an unanticipated mortality shock that resulted from the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, which killed large shares of the residents of some Indonesian communities but caused no deaths in neighboring communities. Using population-representative multilevel longitudinal data, we identify a behavioral fertility response to mortality exposure, both at the level of a couple and in the broader community. We observe a sustained fertility increase at the aggregate level following the tsunami, which was driven by two behavioral responses to mortality exposure. First, mothers who lost one or more children in the disaster were significantly more likely to bear additional children after the tsunami. This response explains about 13 % of the aggregate increase in fertility. Second, women without children before the tsunami initiated family-building earlier in communities where tsunami-related mortality rates were higher, indicating that the fertility of these women is an important route to rebuilding the population in the aftermath of a mortality shock. Such community-level effects have received little attention in demographic scholarship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 228 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 29%
Student > Master 45 19%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 83 35%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 37 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 56 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#485,617
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#131
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,863
of 363,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.