| Title |
Promises and pitfalls of electronic health record analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-017-4518-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Farmer, Rohini Mathur, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Sophie V. Eastwood, Nish Chaturvedi, Liam Smeeth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
| Researcher | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,213,404
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,579
of 5,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,366
of 450,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#47
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.