| Title |
Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-014-0814-2 |
| Authors |
Anne-Marie Boulay, Masaharu Motoshita, Stephan Pfister, Cécile Bulle, Ivan Muñoz, Helen Franceschini, Manuele Margni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 77 | 39% |
| Engineering | 33 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,839,484
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#387
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,926
of 263,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.