↓ Skip to main content

Asthma – A Disease of How We Breathe: Role of Breathing Exercises and Pranayam

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Asthma – A Disease of How We Breathe: Role of Breathing Exercises and Pranayam
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12098-017-2519-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jhuma Sankar, Rashmi Ranjan Das

Abstract

To describe the role of breathing exercises or yoga and/or pranayama in the management of childhood asthma. We conducted an updated literature search and retrieved relevant literature on the role of breathing exercises or yoga and/or pranayama in the management of childhood asthma. We found that the breathing exercises or yoga and/or pranayama are generally multi-component packaged interventions, and are described as follows: Papworth technique, Buteyko technique, Yoga and/or Pranayam. These techniques primarily modify the pattern of breathing to reduce hyperventilation resulting in normalisation of CO2 level, reduction of bronchospasm and resulting breathlessness. In addition they also change the behaviour, decrease anxiety, improve immunological parameters, and improve endurance of the respiratory muscles that may ultimately help asthmatic children. We found 10 clinical trials conducted in children with asthma of varying severity, and found to benefit children with chronic (mild and moderate) and uncontrolled asthma, but not acute severe asthma. Breathing exercises or yoga and/or pranayama may benefit children with chronic (mild and moderate) and uncontrolled asthma, but not acute severe asthma. Before these techniques can be incorporated into the standard care of asthmatic children, important outcomes like quality of life, medication use, and patient reported outcomes need to be evaluated in future clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 75 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 18%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 82 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,257,978
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#922
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,264
of 442,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.