↓ Skip to main content

Bad faith, medical education, and post-truth

Overview of attention for article published in Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Bad faith, medical education, and post-truth
Published in
Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40037-017-0394-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Bleakley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#553
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#385,951
of 446,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.