| Title |
Sketching Awareness: A Participatory Study to Elicit Designs for Supporting Ad Hoc Emergency Medical Teamwork
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10606-014-9210-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana Kusunoki, Aleksandra Sarcevic, Zhan Zhang, Maria Yala |
| Abstract |
Prior CSCW research on awareness in clinical settings has mostly focused on higher-level team coordination spanning across longer-term trajectories at the department and inter-department levels. In this paper, we offer a perspective on what awareness means within the context of an ad hoc, time- and safety-critical medical setting by looking at teams treating severely ill patients with urgent needs. We report findings from four participatory design workshops conducted with emergency medicine clinicians at two regional emergency departments. Workshops were developed to elicit design ideas for information displays that support awareness in emergency medical situations. Through analysis of discussions and clinicians' sketches of information displays, we identified five features of teamwork that can be used as a foundation for supporting awareness from the perspective of clinicians. Based on these findings, we contribute rich descriptions of four facets of awareness that teams manage during emergency medical situations: team member awareness, elapsed time awareness, teamwork-oriented and patient-driven task awareness, and overall progress awareness. We then discuss these four awareness types in relation to awareness facets found in the CSCW literature. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 22 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#255
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,526
of 239,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.