↓ Skip to main content

Preserved emotional awareness of pain in a patient with extensive bilateral damage to the insula, anterior cingulate, and amygdala

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 2,030)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Preserved emotional awareness of pain in a patient with extensive bilateral damage to the insula, anterior cingulate, and amygdala
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00429-014-0986-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin S. Feinstein, Sahib S. Khalsa, Tim V. Salomons, Kenneth M. Prkachin, Laura A. Frey-Law, Jennifer E. Lee, Daniel Tranel, David Rudrauf

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging investigations of pain have discovered a reliable pattern of activation within limbic regions of a putative "pain matrix" that has been theorized to reflect the affective dimension of pain. To test this theory, we evaluated the experience of pain in a rare neurological patient with extensive bilateral lesions encompassing core limbic structures of the pain matrix, including the insula, anterior cingulate, and amygdala. Despite widespread damage to these regions, the patient's expression and experience of pain was intact, and at times excessive in nature. This finding was consistent across multiple pain measures including self-report, facial expression, vocalization, withdrawal reaction, and autonomic response. These results challenge the notion of a "pain matrix" and provide direct evidence that the insula, anterior cingulate, and amygdala are not necessary for feeling the suffering inherent to pain. The patient's heightened degree of pain affect further suggests that these regions may be more important for the regulation of pain rather than providing the decisive substrate for pain's conscious experience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 148 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 36%
Neuroscience 25 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#573,918
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#23
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,028
of 359,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.