↓ Skip to main content

Post-Soviet Placebos: Epistemology and Authority in Russian Treatments for Alcoholism

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Post-Soviet Placebos: Epistemology and Authority in Russian Treatments for Alcoholism
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11013-009-9163-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Raikhel

Abstract

The dominant modalities of treatment for alcoholism in Russia are suggestion-based methods developed by narcology-the subspecialty of Russian psychiatry which deals with addiction. A particularly popular method is the use of disulfiram-an alcohol antagonist-for which narcologists commonly substitute neutral substances. Drawing on 14 months of fieldwork at narcological clinics in St. Petersburg, this article examines the epistemological and institutional conditions which facilitate this practice of "placebo therapy." I argue that narcologists' embrace of such treatments has been shaped by a clinical style of reasoning specific to a Soviet and post-Soviet psychiatry, itself the product of contested Soviet politics over the knowledge of the mind and brain. This style of reasoning has facilitated narcologists' understanding of disulfiram as a behavioral, rather than a pharmacological, treatment and has disposed them to amplify patients' responses through attention to the performative aspects of the clinical encounter and through management of the treatment's broader reputation as an effective therapy. Moreover, such therapies have generally depended upon, and helped to reinforce, clinical encounters premised on a steeply hierarchical physician-patient relationship.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
China 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Psychology 10 11%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,685,528
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#406
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,892
of 170,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them