↓ Skip to main content

A high-throughput solid-phase microextraction and post-loop mixing large volume injection method for water samples

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chromatography A, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A high-throughput solid-phase microextraction and post-loop mixing large volume injection method for water samples
Published in
Journal of Chromatography A, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.11.051
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.A. Baz-Lomba, Arndís Sue-Ching Löve, Malcolm J. Reid, Kristín Ólafsdóttir, Kevin V. Thomas

Abstract

This article presents a novel approach for the analysis of 13 drugs in wastewater for use in wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) studies. Sample preparation remains one of the principal bottlenecks in modern high-throughput analysis by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The proposed methodology is based on the micro-extraction of small volumes (1 ml) of wastewater using a HLB 96-well microplate and both large volume injection (LVI) and post-loop mixing injection (PLM). With this configuration, the limits of quantification (LOQ) were below the reported environmental concentrations of the target compounds in wastewater. Furthermore, both the complexity of collecting, transporting and storing the wastewater sample, sample preparation time, cost and amount of solvent used are all diminished, enhancing the suitability of this methodology for future WBE studies. A new workflow is also proposed in order to create a virtual specimen library bank for WBE by using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). The method was validated and the limits of quantification were between 0.2 and 6.3 ng L-1. The relative standard deviations (RSD) for a standard mixture at 200 ng L-1 (n = 6) was between 3.4 and 14.4% while the recoveries for the 13 drug target residues (DTR) were between 92 and 110%. The developed and validated method was finally successfully applied to 10 wastewater samples collected from Oslo, Norway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 15 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 20%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 18 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography A
#9,538
of 11,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,327
of 445,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography A
#50
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.