↓ Skip to main content

Cerebral Revascularization: Which Patients Should Be Bypassed and Which Patients Should Be Passed by?

Overview of attention for article published in World Neurosurgery, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebral Revascularization: Which Patients Should Be Bypassed and Which Patients Should Be Passed by?
Published in
World Neurosurgery, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian M. Howard, Daniel L. Barrow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 74%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from World Neurosurgery
#4,625
of 7,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,281
of 361,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Neurosurgery
#26
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.