↓ Skip to main content

Approaching a network connectivity-driven classification of the psychosis continuum: a selective review and suggestions for future research

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Approaching a network connectivity-driven classification of the psychosis continuum: a selective review and suggestions for future research
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01047
Pubmed ID
Authors

André Schmidt, Vaibhav A. Diwadkar, Renata Smieskova, Fabienne Harrisberger, Undine E. Lang, Philip McGuire, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Stefan Borgwardt

Abstract

Brain changes in schizophrenia evolve along a dynamic trajectory, emerging before disease onset and proceeding with ongoing illness. Recent investigations have focused attention on functional brain interactions, with experimental imaging studies supporting the disconnection hypothesis of schizophrenia. These studies have revealed a broad spectrum of abnormalities in brain connectivity in patients, particularly for connections integrating the frontal cortex. A critical point is that brain connectivity abnormalities, including altered resting state connectivity within the fronto-parietal (FP) network, are already observed in non-help-seeking individuals with psychotic-like experiences. If we consider psychosis as a continuum, with individuals with psychotic-like experiences at the lower and psychotic patients at the upper ends, individuals with psychotic-like experiences represent a key population for investigating the validity of putative biomarkers underlying the onset of psychosis. This paper selectively addresses the role played by FP connectivity in the psychosis continuum, which includes patients with chronic psychosis, early psychosis, clinical high risk, genetic high risk, as well as the general population with psychotic experiences. We first discuss structural connectivity changes among the FP pathway in each domain in the psychosis continuum. This may provide a basis for us to gain an understanding of the subsequent changes in functional FP connectivity. We further indicate that abnormal FP connectivity may arise from glutamatergic disturbances of this pathway, in particular from abnormal NMDA receptor-mediated plasticity. In the second part of this paper we propose some concepts for further research on the use of network connectivity in the classification of the psychosis continuum. These concepts are consistent with recent efforts to enhance the role of data in driving the diagnosis of psychiatric spectrum diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 219 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 37 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 26%
Psychology 42 19%
Neuroscience 35 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 61 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,389,490
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,060
of 7,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,323
of 353,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#154
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.