↓ Skip to main content

RAS-pathway mutation patterns define epigenetic subclasses in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RAS-pathway mutation patterns define epigenetic subclasses in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02177-w
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is an aggressive myeloproliferative disorder of early childhood characterized by mutations activating RAS signaling. Established clinical and genetic markers fail to fully recapitulate the clinical and biological heterogeneity of this disease. Here we report DNA methylome analysis and mutation profiling of 167 JMML samples. We identify three JMML subgroups with unique molecular and clinical characteristics. The high methylation group (HM) is characterized by somatic PTPN11 mutations and poor clinical outcome. The low methylation group is enriched for somatic NRAS and CBL mutations, as well as for Noonan patients, and has a good prognosis. The intermediate methylation group (IM) shows enrichment for monosomy 7 and somatic KRAS mutations. Hypermethylation is associated with repressed chromatin, genes regulated by RAS signaling, frequent co-occurrence of RAS pathway mutations and upregulation of DNMT1 and DNMT3B, suggesting a link between activation of the DNA methylation machinery and mutational patterns in JMML.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 45 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 52 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#850,295
of 31,660,612 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#14,797
of 76,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,264
of 474,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#329
of 1,381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,660,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.