↓ Skip to main content

The statistical geometry of transcriptome divergence in cell-type evolution and cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The statistical geometry of transcriptome divergence in cell-type evolution and cancer
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cong Liang, Alistair R.R. Forrest, Günter P. Wagner

Abstract

In evolution, body plan complexity increases due to an increase in the number of individualized cell types. Yet, there is very little understanding of the mechanisms that produce this form of organismal complexity. One model for the origin of novel cell types is the sister cell-type model. According to this model, each cell type arises together with a sister cell type through specialization from an ancestral cell type. A key prediction of the sister cell-type model is that gene expression profiles of cell types exhibit tree structure. Here we present a statistical model for detecting tree structure in transcriptomic data and apply it to transcriptomes from ENCODE and FANTOM5. We show that transcriptomes of normal cells harbour substantial amounts of hierarchical structure. In contrast, cancer cell lines have less tree structure, suggesting that the emergence of cancer cells follows different principles from that of evolutionary cell-type origination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 2 2%
Taiwan 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 95 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 30%
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 25%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,457,782
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#34,239
of 52,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,334
of 362,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#388
of 674 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 674 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.