You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of a Computer-Guided, Quality Improvement Program for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management in Primary Health Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circoutcomes.114.001235 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Peiris, Tim Usherwood, Kathryn Panaretto, Mark Harris, Jennifer Hunt, Julie Redfern, Nicholas Zwar, Stephen Colagiuri, Noel Hayman, Serigne Lo, Bindu Patel, Marilyn Lyford, Stephen MacMahon, Bruce Neal, David Sullivan, Alan Cass, Rod Jackson, Anushka Patel |
| Abstract |
Despite effective treatments to reduce cardiovascular disease risk, their translation into practice is limited. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 24% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#1,347
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,409
of 360,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#27
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.