| Title |
Beyond lip service and box ticking: how effective patient engagement is integral to the development and delivery of patient-reported outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-014-0909-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Absolom, P. Holch, B. Woroncow, E. P. Wright, G. Velikova |
| Abstract |
In the UK, demonstration of patient and public involvement (PPI) is now a funding requirement. Despite advice being available to researchers regarding PPI, levels of engagement are variable. Patient involvement has been at the core of the Leeds Psychosocial Oncology and Clinical Practice Research Group since 2007 when a local Research Advisory Group (RAG) was established. In addition, we work with experienced patient advocates from national groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 16% |
| Researcher | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 18% |
| Psychology | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,038,290
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#49
of 2,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,229
of 351,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.