↓ Skip to main content

Ipsilesional functional recruitment within lower mu band in children with unilateral cerebral palsy, an event-related desynchronization study

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Ipsilesional functional recruitment within lower mu band in children with unilateral cerebral palsy, an event-related desynchronization study
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00221-017-5149-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Inuggi, Michela Bassolino, Chiara Tacchino, Valentina Pippo, Valeria Bergamaschi, Claudio Campus, Valentina De Franchis, Thierry Pozzo, Paolo Moretti

Abstract

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of non-progressive developmental movement disorders inducing a strong brain reorganization in primary and secondary motor areas. Nevertheless, few studies have been dedicated to quantify brain pattern changes and correlate them with motor characteristics in CP children. In this context, it is very important to identify feasible and complementary tools able to enrich the description of motor impairments by considering their neural correlates. To this aim, we recorded the electroencephalographic activity and the corresponding event-related desynchronization (ERD) of a group of mild-to-moderate affected unilateral CP children while performing unilateral reach-to-grasp movements with both their paretic and non-paretic arms. During paretic arm movement execution, we found a reduced ERD in the upper µ band (10-12.5 Hz) over central electrodes, preceded by an increased fronto-central ERD in the lower µ band (7.5-10 Hz) during movement preparation. These changes positively correlated, respectively, with the Modified House Classification scale and the Manual Ability Classification System. The fronto-central activation likely represents an ipsilesional plastic compensatory reorganization, confirming that in not-severely affected CP, the lesioned hemisphere is able to compensate part of the damage effects. These results highlight the importance of analyzing different sub-bands within the classical mu band and suggest that in similar CP population, the lesioned hemisphere should be the target of specific intensive rehabilitation programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Engineering 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,486,175
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,017
of 3,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,073
of 439,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#28
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.