↓ Skip to main content

A process for the critical analysis of instructional theory

Overview of attention for article published in Educational technology research and development, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
A process for the critical analysis of instructional theory
Published in
Educational technology research and development, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11423-014-9346-5
Authors

Jay A. Bostwick, Isaac Wade Calvert, Jenifer Francis, Melissa Hawkley, Curtis R. Henrie, Frederick R. Hyatt, Janeel Juncker, Andrew S. Gibbons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 45%
Computer Science 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,550,591
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#234
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,554
of 238,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.