↓ Skip to main content

Soil-Borne Microbiome: Linking Diversity to Function

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
543 Mendeley
Title
Soil-Borne Microbiome: Linking Diversity to Function
Published in
Microbial Ecology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00248-014-0559-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas W. Mendes, Siu M. Tsai, Acácio A. Navarrete, Mattias de Hollander, Johannes A. van Veen, Eiko E. Kuramae

Abstract

Soil microorganisms are sensitive to environment disturbances, and such alterations have consequences on microbial diversity and functions. Our hypothesis is that alpha diversity of microbial communities and functional diversity decrease from undisturbed to disturbed soils, with consequences for functional redundancy in the soil ecosystem. To test this hypothesis, we used soil DNA shotgun metagenomics approach to assess the soil microbiome in a chronosequence of land-use from a native tropical forest, followed by deforestation and cultivation of soybean croplands and pasture in different seasons. Agriculture and pasture soils were among the most diverse and presented higher functional redundancy, which is important to maintain the ecosystem functioning after the forest conversion. On the other hand, the ecosystem equilibrium in forest is maintained based on a lower alpha diversity but higher abundance of microorganisms. Our results indicate that land-use change alters the structure and composition of microbial communities; however, ecosystem functionality is overcome by different strategies based on the abundance and diversity of the communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 543 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 530 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 20%
Researcher 94 17%
Student > Master 76 14%
Student > Bachelor 55 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 8%
Other 62 11%
Unknown 100 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 238 44%
Environmental Science 85 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 1%
Other 36 7%
Unknown 131 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,588,970
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#673
of 2,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,426
of 361,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.