↓ Skip to main content

Symmetry and its role in the crossmodal correspondence between shape and taste

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Symmetry and its role in the crossmodal correspondence between shape and taste
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, December 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13414-017-1463-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nora Turoman, Carlos Velasco, Yi-Chuan Chen, Pi-Chun Huang, Charles Spence

Abstract

Despite the rapid growth of research on the crossmodal correspondence between visually presented shapes and basic tastes (e.g., sweet, sour, bitter, and salty), most studies that have been published to date have focused on shape contour (roundness/angularity). Meanwhile, other important features, such as symmetry, as well as the underlying mechanisms of the shape-taste correspondence, have rarely been studied. Over two experiments, we systematically manipulated the symmetry and contours of shapes and measured the influences of these variables on shape-taste correspondences. Furthermore, we investigated a potential underlying mechanism, based on the common affective appraisal of stimuli in different sensory modalities. We replicated the results of previous studies showing that round shapes are associated with sweet taste, whereas angular shapes are associated with sour and bitter tastes. In addition, we demonstrated a novel effect that the symmetry group of a shape influences how it is associated with taste. A significant relationship was observed between the taste and appraisal scores of the shapes, suggesting that the affective factors of pleasantness and threat underlie the shape-taste correspondence. These results were consistent across cultures, when we compared participants from Taiwanese and Western (UK, US, Canada) cultures. Our findings highlight that perceived pleasantness and threat are culturally common factors involved in at least some crossmodal correspondences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 12%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,535,640
of 24,742,536 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#267
of 1,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,204
of 451,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,742,536 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.