↓ Skip to main content

Antibodies to neurofilament protein and other brain proteins reveal the innervation of peripheral organs

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, November 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Antibodies to neurofilament protein and other brain proteins reveal the innervation of peripheral organs
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, November 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00489980
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. W. Hacker, J. M. Polak, D. R. Springall, J. Ballesta, A. Cadieux, J. Gu, J. Q. Trojanowski, D. Dahl, P. J. Marangos

Abstract

Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to neurofilament proteins, neuron-specific enolase, glial fibrillary acidic protein and S-100 have been used to demonstrate nerves, ganglion cells and the supportive glial system of the innervation of various organs. The female genitalia, the urinary tract, the respiratory system, the pancreas, the heart and the skin of several mammalian species, including rat, mouse, guinea pig, cat, pig, monkey and man were fixed in para-benzoquinone and portions of each organ were snap frozen. Serial or free-floating thick cryostat sections were stained using indirect immunofluorescence and peroxidase anti-peroxidase immunocytochemistry. In addition, the newly described and highly sensitive immunogold-silver staining technique was used on Bouin's-fixed and wax-embedded tissues. Antibodies to neurofilament proteins seemed to react with neuronal structures in all the species studied. Alternately stained serial sections showed a similar distribution of neurofilament proteins and neuron-specific enolase-containing nerves. Neuron-specific enolase staining had a diffuse appearance and was found to be highly variable, indicating that the neuron-specific enolase content might be related to the physiological state of the nerves and ganglion cells, whereas antibodies to neurofilament protein gave a consistently intense and very clear picture of the ganglion cells and nerve fibres. Antibodies to S-100 stained supportive elements of the peripheral nervous system in all tissues examined, whereas antibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein were more selective.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Unspecified 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#855
of 1,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,318
of 10,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.