↓ Skip to main content

Computation of the inverse additive relationship matrix for autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Computation of the inverse additive relationship matrix for autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00122-017-3041-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew G. Hamilton, Richard J. Kerr

Abstract

Rules to generate the inverse additive relationship matrix (A -1 ) are defined to enable the adoption restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) in autopolyploid populations with multiple ploidy levels. Many important agronomic, horticultural, ornamental, forestry, and aquaculture species are autopolyploids. However, the adoption of restricted maximum likelihood (REML), for estimating co/variance components, and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), for predicting breeding values, has been hampered in autopolyploid breeding by the absence of an appropriate means of generating the inverse additive relationship matrix (A -1 ). This paper defines rules to generate the A -1 of autopolyploid populations comprised of individuals of the same or different ploidy-levels, including populations exhibiting (1) odd-numbered ploidy levels (e.g. triploids), (2) sex-based differences in the probability that gametic genes are identical by descent and (3) somatic chromosome doubling. Inbreeding, due to double reduction, in autopolyploid founders in the absence of mating among relatives is also accounted for. A previously defined approach is modified, whereby rules are initially defined to build an inverse matrix of kinship coefficients (K -1 ), which is then used to generate A -1 . An R package (polyAinv; https://github.com/mghamilton/polyAinv ) to implement these rules has been developed and examples of analyses provided. The adoption of REML and BLUP methods made possible by these new rules has the potential to provide further insights into the quantitative genetic architecture of autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations, improve estimates of breeding values, and increase genetic gains made through recurrent selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Researcher 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,555,227
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#2,878
of 3,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,858
of 452,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#33
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,733 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.