↓ Skip to main content

Why do we map threats? Linking threat mapping with actions to make better conservation decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
58 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
499 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why do we map threats? Linking threat mapping with actions to make better conservation decisions
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, January 2015
DOI 10.1890/140022
Authors

Vivitskaia JD Tulloch, Ayesha IT Tulloch, Piero Visconti, Benjamin S Halpern, James EM Watson, Megan C Evans, Nancy A Auerbach, Megan Barnes, Maria Beger, Iadine Chadès, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Eve McDonald-Madden, Nicholas J Murray, Jeremy Ringma, Hugh P Possingham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 499 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Australia 4 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 470 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 141 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 16%
Student > Master 65 13%
Other 43 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 5%
Other 60 12%
Unknown 84 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 187 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 3%
Social Sciences 6 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 <1%
Other 17 3%
Unknown 114 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#624,794
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#220
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,128
of 381,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.