↓ Skip to main content

Primary Cilia Exist in a Small Fraction of Cells in Trabecular Bone and Marrow

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary Cilia Exist in a Small Fraction of Cells in Trabecular Bone and Marrow
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00223-014-9928-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas R. Coughlin, Muriel Voisin, Mitchell B. Schaffler, Glen L. Niebur, Laoise M. McNamara

Abstract

Primary cilia are potent mechanical and chemical sensory organelles in cells of bone lineage in tissue culture. Cell culture experiments suggest that primary cilia sense fluid flow and this stimulus is translated through biochemical signaling into an osteogenic response in bone cells. Moreover, in vivo, primary cilia knockout in bone cells attenuates bone formation in response to loading. However, understanding the role of the primary cilium in bone mechanotransduction requires knowledge of its incidence and location in vivo. We used immunohistochemistry to quantify the number of cells with primary cilia within the trabecular bone tissue and the enclosed marrow of ovine cervical vertebrae. Primary cilia were identified in osteocytes, bone lining cells, and in cells within the marrow, but were present in only a small fraction of cells. Approximately 4 % of osteocytes and 4.6 % of bone lining cells expressed primary cilia. Within the marrow space, only approximately 1 % of cells presented primary cilia. The low incidence of primary cilia may indicate that cilia either function as mechanosensors in a selected number of cells, function in concert with other mechanosensing mechanisms, or that the role of primary cilia in mechanosensing is secondary to its role in chemosensing or cellular attachment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Engineering 5 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#17,714,383
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#1,421
of 1,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,655
of 256,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.