| Title |
Writing an effective literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40037-017-0401-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorelei Lingard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 305 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 10% |
| Canada | 27 | 9% |
| Australia | 23 | 8% |
| South Africa | 17 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 8 | 3% |
| Uganda | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 50 | 16% |
| Unknown | 103 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 146 | 48% |
| Scientists | 111 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 372 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 7% |
| Researcher | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 24% |
| Unknown | 91 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 25 | 7% |
| Engineering | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 116 | 31% |
| Unknown | 100 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 209. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#190,920
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#3
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,156
of 449,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.