↓ Skip to main content

Allergen-Specific T Cells in IgE-Mediated Food Allergy

Overview of attention for article published in Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Allergen-Specific T Cells in IgE-Mediated Food Allergy
Published in
Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00005-017-0501-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aziza Saidova, Ahuva Magder Hershkop, Marta Ponce, Thomas Eiwegger

Abstract

Food allergy is the major reason for severe anaphylaxis in childhood and adolescence. Currently, effective and safe treatments for food allergy are unavailable. Allergen-specific CD4+ T cells have a pivotal role in causing and maintaining the allergic response to food allergens. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview on the role of allergen-specific T cells in food allergy during allergic sensitization, natural tolerance development and allergen immunotherapy. Allergen-specific T cells in the context of food allergy are predominantly of a Th2 type with slightly different surface marker expression patterns in different food allergies. During the process of reverting food allergy to a status of tolerance or sustained unresponsiveness there is a loss of this Th2 committed compartment with an asymptotic approximation to a regulatory and Th0/Th1 dominated compartment seen in non-allergic individuals. This process is accompanied by a significant reduction of absolute frequencies of allergen-specific T cells. Particularly, regulatory T cells may provide significant help to achieve sustained control of the effector cell populations via suppression of effector cell function and possibly induction of blocking antibodies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#286
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,406
of 442,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.