↓ Skip to main content

Derogating victims and dehumanizing perpetrators: Functions of two types of beliefs in a just world

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 692)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
94 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Derogating victims and dehumanizing perpetrators: Functions of two types of beliefs in a just world
Published in
Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 2015
DOI 10.4992/jjpsy.86.13069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aya Murayama, Asako Miura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 54%
Unspecified 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#621,316
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#5
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,547
of 361,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.