You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Geohistory of the Formation of the Niigata Sand Dunes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), January 1996
|
| DOI | 10.4116/jaqua.35.207 |
| Authors |
Hisao Tanaka, Tadasi Hasegawa, Sumie Kimura, Ikuei Okamoto, Youiti Sakai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#32
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,390
of 80,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them