Title |
Macroseismic survey of the ML5.5, 2014 Orkney earthquake
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Seismology, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10950-015-9491-2 |
Authors |
V. Midzi, B. Zulu, B. Manzunzu, T. Mulabisana, T. Pule, S. Myendeki, W. Gubela |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 40% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 40% |
Engineering | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,050,493
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Seismology
#6
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,518
of 263,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Seismology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them