↓ Skip to main content

Optimisation of sonourethrography: the clamp method

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Optimisation of sonourethrography: the clamp method
Published in
European Radiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00330-017-5211-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan de Dios Berná-Mestre, Thierry Balmaceda, Diego Martínez, Jose F. Escudero, Gloria Martínez, José A. García, Manuel Canteras, Juan D. Berná-Serna

Abstract

To describe the clamp method for performing retrograde sonourethrography (RSUG) and contrast-enhanced voiding sonourethrography (CE-VSUG) via the transperineal approach in male adults. Prospective study of 113 males (14-86 years) with urethral strictures confirmed by urethrography who received sonourethrography via the clamp method between 2011 and 2015. The characteristic parameters of the quantitative variables were calculated and a comparative analysis of the qualitative variables was conducted using the McNemar test. RSUG was performed successfully in all the cases (n = 113) and detected 49 cases with anterior urethral strictures; the strictures in the proximal bulbar cone in five of them (10.2%) were not visualised on retrograde urethrography (RUG) (p < 0.05). CE-VSUG was performed successfully in 97 cases and observed posterior urethral strictures in 82; the bladder neck strictures in 6 of them (7.3%) were not observed on voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) (p < 0.05). Retrograde bladder filling was achieved in approximately 6 min. The clamp method enables RSUG and CE-VSUG to be performed simply, effectively and painlessly by a single operator. It also allows the evaluation of cases with urethromeatal alterations (stricture, hypospadias and meatotomy). • The clamp method enables RSUG to be performed simply and painlessly. • The clamp method requires only one operator and allows assessing urethromeatal alterations. • RSUG shows greater capacity for detecting anterior urethral strictures than RUG. • The clamp method achieves retrograde bladder filling in approximately 6 min. • CE-VSUG shows greater capacity for detecting strictures than VCUG.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 65%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,568,388
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#566
of 4,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,834
of 439,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#12
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.