↓ Skip to main content

Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Risk Management: A Case of R

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Risk Management: A Case of R&D Investment
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2528-6
Authors

Shimin Chen, Xu Ni, Jamie Y. Tong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 267 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 17%
Student > Master 34 13%
Lecturer 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 90 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 99 37%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 38 14%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Unspecified 5 2%
Materials Science 3 1%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 97 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,389,490
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,551
of 2,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,435
of 352,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#45
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.