↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic intramolecular regulation of the histone chaperone nucleoplasmin controls histone binding and release

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic intramolecular regulation of the histone chaperone nucleoplasmin controls histone binding and release
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02308-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Warren, Tsutomu Matsui, Jerome M. Karp, Takashi Onikubo, Sean Cahill, Michael Brenowitz, David Cowburn, Mark Girvin, David Shechter

Abstract

Nucleoplasmin (Npm) is a highly conserved histone chaperone responsible for the maternal storage and zygotic release of histones H2A/H2B. Npm contains a pentameric N-terminal core domain and an intrinsically disordered C-terminal tail domain. Though intrinsically disordered regions are common among histone chaperones, their roles in histone binding and chaperoning remain unclear. Using an NMR-based approach, here we demonstrate that the Xenopus laevis Npm tail domain controls the binding of histones at its largest acidic stretch (A2) via direct competition with both the C-terminal basic stretch and basic nuclear localization signal. NMR and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) structural analyses allowed us to construct models of both the tail domain and the pentameric complex. Functional analyses demonstrate that these competitive intramolecular interactions negatively regulate Npm histone chaperone activity in vitro. Together these data establish a potentially generalizable mechanism of histone chaperone regulation via dynamic and specific intramolecular shielding of histone interaction sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 22%
Chemistry 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,542,740
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#37,098
of 47,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,757
of 440,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,050
of 1,377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.