↓ Skip to main content

Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole
Published in
Journal of Physiology, February 2002
DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M. Kennedy, J. Timothy Inglis

Abstract

To document the activity of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the glabrous skin of the foot sole, tungsten microelectrodes were inserted through the popliteal fossa and into the tibial nerve of thirteen healthy human subjects. A total of 104 cutaneous mechanoreceptors were identified in the glabrous skin of the foot. This sample consisted of 15 slow adapting type I (14 %), 16 slow adapting type II (15 %), 59 fast adapting type I (57 %), and 14 fast adapting type II units (14 %). The location of the receptors and the outline of the receptive fields were determined by using nylon monofilaments perpendicularly applied against the surface of the skin. This revealed that the receptors were widely distributed without an accumulation of receptors in the toes. There were also larger receptive fields predominantly isolated on the plantar surface of the metatarsal-tarsal region of the foot sole. Furthermore, with the foot in an unloaded position, there was no background discharge activity in any of the cutaneous receptors in the absence of intentionally applied stimulation. These findings suggest that skin receptors in the foot sole behave differently from those receptors found on the glabrous skin of the hand. This may reflect the role of foot sole skin receptors in standing balance and movement control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 332 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 19%
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Researcher 37 11%
Other 22 6%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 60 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 18%
Engineering 56 16%
Sports and Recreations 46 13%
Neuroscience 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 78 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,339,559
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology
#2,311
of 9,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,925
of 132,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology
#10
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.