↓ Skip to main content

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and combined therapy in patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria and other cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review of…

Overview of attention for article published in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and combined therapy in patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria and other cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, March 2011
DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfq792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ausilia Maione, Sankar D. Navaneethan, Giusi Graziano, Ruth Mitchell, David Johnson, Johannes F.E. Mann, Peggy Gao, Jonathan C. Craig, Giovanni Tognoni, Vlado Perkovic, Antonio Nicolucci, Salvatore De Cosmo, Antonio Sasso, Olga Lamacchia, Mauro Cignarelli, Valeria Maria Manfreda, Giorgio Gentile, Giovanni F.M. Strippoli

Abstract

A recent clinical trial showed harmful renal effects with the combined use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARB) in people with diabetes or vascular disease. We examined the benefits and risks of these agents in people with albuminuria and one or more cardiovascular risk factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 23 27%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,946,410
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
#2,551
of 5,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,788
of 108,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
#15
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.