↓ Skip to main content

Long-term effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the management of gallstone pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Long-term effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the management of gallstone pancreatitis
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-3138-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdalla Mustafa, Irena Begaj, Mark Deakin, Damien Durkin, David J. Corless, Richard Wilson, John P. Slavin

Abstract

Gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is a common condition, accounting for 30-40 % of all pancreatitis cases. All GSP patients should undergo definitive treatment to prevent further attacks. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcome after definitive treatment in England by cholecystectomy, endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), or both.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 13 26%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 60%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,071,115
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,665
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,758
of 200,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#21
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.