↓ Skip to main content

PHF-like tau phosphorylation in mammalian hibernation is not associated with p25-formation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
PHF-like tau phosphorylation in mammalian hibernation is not associated with p25-formation
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00702-008-0181-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Thorsten Stieler, Torsten Bullmann, Franziska Kohl, Brian M. Barnes, Thomas Arendt

Abstract

In Alzheimer's disease and related disorders, hyperphosphorylation of tau is associated with an increased activity of cyclin dependent kinase 5 (cdk5). Elevated cdk5 activity is thought to be due to the formation of p25 and thereby represents a critical element in the dysregulation of tau phosphorylation under pathological conditions. However, there is still a controversy regarding the correlation of p25 generation and tau pathology. Recently, we demonstrated physiological, paired helical filament-like tau phosphorylation that reversibly occurs in hibernating mammals. Here we used this model to test whether the tau phosphorylation in hibernation is associated with the formation of p25. Analysing brain material of arctic ground squirrels and Syrian hamsters we found no evidence for a hibernation dependent generation of p25. Hence, we suppose that phosphorylation of tau does not require the formation of p25. Instead we suggest that the truncation of p35 to p25 represents a characteristic of pathological alterations and may contribute to aggregation and deposition of hyperphosphorylated tau.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,669,138
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#525
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,950
of 171,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.