↓ Skip to main content

Colovaginal anastomosis: A totally unacceptable surgical error

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colovaginal anastomosis: A totally unacceptable surgical error
Published in
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.12.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milcho Panovski, Ivana Roso Sazdovska, Igor Fildisevski, Darko Dzambaz, Vasilcho Spirov

Abstract

The low anterior rectal resection and double stapling technique are well-established surgical procedures with well-known pitfalls, potential complications, and preventive measures. Colovaginal anastomosis is a surgical error which should not occur.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
#205
of 3,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,887
of 359,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.