↓ Skip to main content

Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Friend or Foe in Immune-Mediated Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Friend or Foe in Immune-Mediated Diseases
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12015-014-9583-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Gazdic, Vladislav Volarevic, Nebojsa Arsenijevic, Miodrag Stojkovic

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are adult, self-renewable, multipotent cells that can be found in almost all postnatal tissues. Because of their capacity for self-renewal and differentiation into tissues of mesodermal origin and due to their immunomodulatory ability, MSCs are used in many preclinical and clinical studies as possible new therapeutic agents for the autoimmune or degenerative diseases treatment. In dependence of inflammatory environment to which they are exposed to, MSCs adopt immunosuppressive or pro-inflammatory phenotype. In the presence of high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines or through activation of Toll-like receptor (TLR)-3, MSCs adopt an immune-suppressive phenotype and suppress the proliferation, activation and effector function of professional antigen presenting cells (dendritic cells, macrophages, B lymphocytes), T lymphocytes, NK cells, NKT cells, and neutrophils. During the early phase of inflammation, through TLR4 activation and in the presence of low levels of inflammatory cytokines, MSCs adopt a pro-inflammatory phenotype, promote neutrophil and T cell activation and enhance immune response. Here we review the current findings on the immunoregulatory plasticity of MSCs involved in regulation of immune response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 44 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,496,331
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#278
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,361
of 360,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.