↓ Skip to main content

The neural basis of kinesthetic and visual imagery in sports: an ALE meta − analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
The neural basis of kinesthetic and visual imagery in sports: an ALE meta − analysis
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11682-017-9813-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Filgueiras, Erick Francisco Quintas Conde, Craig R. Hall

Abstract

Imagery is a widely spread technique in the sport sciences that entails the mental rehearsal of a given situation to improve an athlete's learning, performance and motivation. Two modalities of imagery are reported to tap into distinct brain structures, but sharing common components: kinesthetic and visual imagery. This study aimed to investigate the neural basis of those types of imagery with Activation Likelihood Estimation algorithm to perform a meta - analysis. A systematic search was used to retrieve only experimental studies with athletes or sportspersons. Altogether, nine studies were selected and an ALE meta - analysis was performed. Results indicated significant activation of the premotor, somatosensory cortex, supplementary motor areas, inferior and superior parietal lobule, caudate, cingulate and cerebellum in both imagery tasks. It was concluded that visual and kinesthetic imagery share similar neural networks which suggests that combined interventions are beneficial to athletes whereas separate use of those two modalities of imagery may seem less efficient from a neuropsychological approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 18 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 53 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 14%
Sports and Recreations 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 57 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#12,865,484
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#429
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,304
of 440,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.