↓ Skip to main content

Endocrine Activities of Pesticides During Ozonation of Waters

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Endocrine Activities of Pesticides During Ozonation of Waters
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00128-017-2254-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Westlund, Siavash Isazadeh, Alexandre Therrien, Viviane Yargeau

Abstract

Two yeast-based bioassays were used to assess the endocrine activity potential of transformation products formed during the ozonation of water containing a variety of pesticides (propiconazole, atrazine, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid [2,4-D], tebuconazole, climbazole, myclobutanil, irgarol, terbutryn, dicamba, mecoprop and diuron). Ozone experiments were conducted first in reverse osmosis water to isolate the effects of the pesticides and then in synthetic wastewater and wastewater effluent to investigate whether the results translated to more complex matrices. The findings demonstrate the recalcitrant nature of most pesticides during ozonation, with removals below 50%, except for irgarol, terbutryn and climbazole with removals up to 70%. This study is the first one to investigate the removal of the fungicides myclobutanil and tebuconazole by ozonation and is one of the first studies to investigate the androgenic activity of ozonation transformation products of contaminants of emerging concern. These findings also demonstrated that during ozonation the initial anti-androgenic activity was removed while the estrogenic activity remained undetected and the androgenic activity increased to levels up to 60% of the anti-androgenic activity of the DHT control. These results indicate that bioactivity should be considered in the evaluation of treatment performance and risks assessment associated to wastewater discharges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 15%
Engineering 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Chemistry 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,322,438
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2,580
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,206
of 448,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#34
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.