↓ Skip to main content

A Narrative Review of Potential Future Antidiabetic Drugs: Should We Expect More?

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
A Narrative Review of Potential Future Antidiabetic Drugs: Should We Expect More?
Published in
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12291-017-0668-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaurav Chikara, Pramod Kumar Sharma, Pradeep Dwivedi, Jaykaran Charan, Sneha Ambwani, Surjit Singh

Abstract

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus, a chronic metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia, is growing worldwide. The majority of the cases belong to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Globally, India ranks second in terms of diabetes prevalence among adults. Currently available classes of therapeutic agents are used alone or in combinations but seldom achieve treatment targets. Diverse pathophysiology and the need of therapeutic agents with more favourable pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics profile make newer drug discoveries in the field of T2DM essential. A large number of molecules, some with novel mechanisms, are in pipeline. The essence of this review is to track and discuss these potential agents, based on their developmental stages, especially those in phase 3 or phase 2. Unique molecules are being developed for existing drug classes like insulins, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 analogues; and under newer classes like dual/pan PPAR agonists, dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitors, glimins, anti-inflammatory agents, glucokinase activators, G-protein coupled receptor agonists, hybrid peptide agonists, apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) inhibitors, glucagon receptor antagonists etc. The heterogeneous clinical presentation and therapeutic outcomes in phenotypically similar patients is a clue to think beyond the standard treatment strategy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 26 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Chemistry 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 28 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,222,450
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
#54
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,269
of 317,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them