↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Boltzmann and Gibbs definitions of entropy in small systems

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal Plus, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Boltzmann and Gibbs definitions of entropy in small systems
Published in
The European Physical Journal Plus, November 2017
DOI 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11756-5
Authors

Loris Ferrari

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,081,236
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal Plus
#51
of 901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,839
of 438,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal Plus
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.